Exome Sequencing

โ† Back to Index (๐Ÿงฌ Genetics)

Definition and Principles

Methodology

Clinical Indications

Category Specific Clinical Indications for Exome Sequencing
Neurodevelopmental Unexplained global developmental delay (GDD), intellectual disability (ID), and autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Complex Phenotypes Multiple congenital anomalies or dysmorphic features that lack a clearly recognizable syndromic pattern.
Atypical Presentations Atypical clinical features of known conditions (e.g., atypical Cornelia de Lange, Coffin-Siris, or Kabuki syndromes) where targeted panels are negative.
Extreme Heterogeneity Disorders where a massive number of genes could be implicated, making single-gene or small panel testing impractical or not cost-effective.
Dual Diagnoses Patients presenting with two or more unrelated phenotypes (e.g., oculocutaneous albinism and neutropenia), suggesting oligogenic phenotypes.

Diagnostic Yield and Advantages

Limitations and Ethical Considerations

Limitation Category Description
Coverage Gaps WES strictly evaluates the amplified DNA segments restricted to the coding regions, meaning it will miss pathogenic variants located in intronic, regulatory, or promoter regions.
Structural Variants While improving, WES is generally less sensitive than chromosomal microarray or whole genome sequencing for detecting large structural variations, translocations, inversions, large deletions/duplications, and triplet repeat expansions.
Variants of Unknown Significance (VUS) WES identifies an enormous amount of genetic variation, commonly revealing over 30,000 VUS in a single individual. Interpreting the pathogenicity of these variants requires extensive functional evidence and can cause diagnostic ambiguity.
Incidental Findings WES may uncover pathogenic variants entirely unrelated to the primary clinical indication (e.g., uncovering a cancer predisposition gene or Alzheimer's susceptibility in a child tested for developmental delay).
Ethical Counseling Pre-test genetic counseling is mandatory to inform families about the possibility of incidental findings and to document their preference regarding the disclosure of medically actionable versus non-actionable secondary findings.